Gushwork llms.txt Generator vs HubSpot AEO Grader
Two GEO Tools options side by side — published data only, hand-verified July 2026.
| Gushwork llms.txt Generator | HubSpot AEO Grader | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GEO Tools | GEO Tools |
| Published pricing | Free (crawls first 20 pages) | Free, no account required |
| Free offer | Free tool | Free tool |
| AI engines covered | — | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini |
| Best for | site owners controlling AI crawler access | a quick free brand perception check |
| Headquarters | — | USA |
Which one should you pick?
Positioning also differs: Gushwork llms.txt Generator aims at site owners controlling AI crawler access, while HubSpot AEO Grader targets a quick free brand perception check. There is no universal winner — shortlist by the engines you need, your budget, and whether you want to try before you buy.
What is Gushwork llms.txt Generator?
Gushwork's llms.txt Generator creates an llms.txt file, a text file placed in a website's root directory that tells AI language models which pages they may or may not crawl, similar to how robots.txt guides search engine crawlers. Users pick a writing tone and paragraph length, enter a URL, and the tool generates the file for download; an example run against gushwork.ai is shown on the page as a sample output.
The generator is aimed at site owners with no technical background and requires no coding to use. The free version crawls only the first 20 pages of a site, a limit the company frames as "fair usage." llms.txt itself is an emerging, non-standardized convention, so the page acknowledges that not all AI crawlers currently respect it.
- Instant llms.txt file generation
- Control LLM crawling per page
- Multiple writing tone options
- Protect sensitive content from AI
- Future-proof SEO for AI era
Full Gushwork llms.txt Generator listing →
What is HubSpot AEO Grader?
HubSpot's AEO Grader is a free, one-time tool that checks how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini describe a brand based on their training data. It scores five dimensions — sentiment (up to 40 points), presence quality (20), brand recognition (20), share of voice (10), and market competition (10) — after users submit company name, location, industry, and product. The result is a composite score out of 100 with a written breakdown.
No account is required, and the check runs once rather than tracking changes over time; for continuous monitoring, HubSpot points users to its separate paid AEO product. The Grader works for any brand, including competitors, making it useful for a quick benchmark rather than ongoing measurement. No pricing applies since the report itself is free.
- Free brand check across AI engines
- Sentiment analysis from AI training data
- Brand recognition and presence scoring
- Share of Voice against competitors
- No account required
Full HubSpot AEO Grader listing →
Comparison compiled by the Geodeck editorial team from both vendors' live websites. Details change fast; always confirm on the official sites.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gushwork llms.txt Generator better than HubSpot AEO Grader?
Neither is universally better. Positioning also differs: Gushwork llms.txt Generator aims at site owners controlling AI crawler access, while HubSpot AEO Grader targets a quick free brand perception check. There is no universal winner — shortlist by the engines you need, your budget, and whether you want to try before you buy.
How do Gushwork llms.txt Generator and HubSpot AEO Grader compare on price?
Gushwork llms.txt Generator: Free (crawls first 20 pages). HubSpot AEO Grader: Free, no account required. Always confirm current pricing on the official websites.
What are alternatives to Gushwork llms.txt Generator and HubSpot AEO Grader?
The Geodeck GEO Tools category lists 10 hand-verified options with a quick-comparison table covering pricing, free offers and engine coverage.
See the whole category
All 10 GEO Tools listings with a sortable quick-comparison.